LNPs in covid injections lead to slow, systemic toxicity and long-term damage

LNPs in covid injections lead to slow, systemic toxicity and long-term damage

By Rhoda Wilson

Posted on June 5, 2025

Lipid nanoparticles (“LNPs”) are very small spherical particles composed of lipids, serving as a pharmaceutical drug delivery system. In mRNA covid vaccines,” for example, LNPs act as delivery vehicles that protect the mRNA and transport it to the right place within cells.

The exact number of LNPs in a single dose of Pfizer-BioNTech’s or Moderna’s covid injection is unknown.  Moderna has responded that it is “irrelevant” and the UK’s drug regulator hasn’t provided an answer.

The use of these LNPs may lead to slow, systemic toxicity, including inflammation, metabolic dysfunction and potential long-term damage, such as neurodegenerative or autoimmune triggers.

“Billions of people have been injected with a poorly characterised chemical delivery system – and now we’re just starting to see the fallout,” World Council of Health says.

Lipid nanoparticle containing mRNA Does this look like a virus albeit man made

This is a modified, as very technical, translation of a Substack post by Genervter Bürger. Thank you to Genervter Bürger and Maria Gutschi for this important summary, see HERE.

The Mystery No One Wants to Solve

Let’s start with a simple question: How many lipid nanoparticles (“LNPs”) are in a single dose of Pfizer’s BNT162b2 or Moderna’s mRNA-1273 vaccine?

You’d think this would be basic information. But when researcher Maria Gutschi went digging, the answers were unsettling.

• Moderna’s response to a Freedom of Information Act request? “We don’t know, and it’s irrelevant.”
• The MHRA (UK’s drug regulator)? Crickets.

The only study we could find detected SM-102 (Moderna’s ionisable lipid) lingering in blood days after injection – still above background levels at Day 7 (0.12 ng/ml).

“Background levels”? For a synthetic, non-human lipid? That’s like saying a tiny bit of arsenic in your coffee is normal.

The Dirty Secret: Oxidation and Contamination

Now, let’s talk about ALC-0315 (Pfizer’s LNP lipid). A structural analysis found:

• 0.19% oxidised impurities in fresh vials.
• The tertiary amine headgroups (the most reactive part) weren’t even fully analysed for oxidation.

Why does this matter?  Because oxidised lipids are biological grenades. They:

• Bind to inflammatory receptors (TLRs, PPARs).
• Disrupt calcium channels and glucose metabolism.
• Promote vesicle aggregation (think: lysosomes clumping together).

And that’s before we even get to what happens inside your cells.

The Mother of All Bombs Moment

A groundbreaking review, ‘The Chemical Reactivity of Membrane Lipids’, drops the mic: “When primary amines are present in membranes (e.g., sphingosine), reactive aldehydes can crosslink them, triggering vesicle aggregation.”

Translation: The ionisable amines in LNPs (ALC-0315/SM-102) don’t just deliver mRNA – they wreak havoc on membrane integrity.

• Cholesterol ratios in LNPs? They speed up lipid hydrolysis (i.e., breakdown).
• Tertiary amines? They bind receptors directly, hijacking cell signalling.

This isn’t just about transfection – it’s about slow, systemic toxicity that flies under the radar of typical safety studies.

The Alarming Implications

1. Endosomal escape gone wrong: LNPs are designed to escape endosomes, but oxidised/altered lipids might clog lysosomes, disrupting cellular waste disposal.
2. Receptor chaos: Oxidised lipids bind PPARs, TLRs, and CD14, fuelling inflammation and metabolic dysfunction.
3. Long-term damage: Hydrolysis and crosslinking could mean progressive cell membrane dysfunction – think neurodegenerative or autoimmune triggers.

The Unanswered Question

Were some vials worse than others? With no batch consistency data, we might never know.

Bottom line: Billions of people have been injected with a poorly characterised chemical delivery system – and now we’re just starting to see the fallout.

What’s Next?

We need transparency from both the vaccine manufacturers and drug regulators. Batch testing, LNP quantification and oxidation studies would be a good start, but we need long-term tracking to understand how long lipids persist in the body, and the extent of cellular damage caused. In the meantime, as ever, World Council for Health continues to call for these dangerous gene therapies to be withdrawn.

All those concerned about toxicity as a result of receiving the mRNA gene therapies can take action to support the body’s healing. Take a look at our ‘Detox & Wellness Guide’ for practical strategies you can take, and consider joining our ‘Detox & Wellbeing Study’.

Rhoda Wilson

• https://expose-news.com/2025/06/02/lnps-in-covid-injections/

Florida Health Department Confirms Pfizer Vaccine Killed Over 470,000 Americans

Florida Health Department Confirms Pfizer Vaccine Killed Over 470,000 Americans

Frank Bergman

Posted on May 8, 2025

The head of Florida’s Department of Health, Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo, has revealed that Pfizer’s Covid mRNA “vaccine” killed over 470,000 Americans.

The alarming finding was revealed in Florida’s official data.

Florida’s Health Department collaborated with scientists from the world-renowned Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) to investigate surges in all-cause mortality rates in the state.

The researchers found that Pfizer’s mRNA “vaccine” in particular caused dramatic increases in deaths from all causes, including COVID-19, non-Covid, and cardiovascular.

Alarmingly, the study confirmed that Covid mRNA “vaccines” triggered a global surge in all-cause mortality rates.

The study found that people who got the Pfizer vaccine had a stunning 36% increase in their all-cause mortality when compared to those who received Moderna’s mRNA injection.

This increased risk lasts for at least a year after the “vaccine” was administered.

Yet, this risk was not an increase from the baseline, as all-cause mortality also spiked among those who received the Moderna “vaccines.”

The findings were just revealed in an explosive new study of 1.4 million people, triggering widespread concerns among doctors, scientists, and health officials everywhere.

The results of the study were just published in the medRxiv journal.

The findings of the study have just been analyzed by my MIT computer scientist, Steve Kirsch, the founder of the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation (VSRF).

Kirsch, who was not involved in the Florida/MIT study, described the revelations as a “train wreck.”

“Vaccines should NEVER increase all-cause mortality,” Kirsch warned on his Substack.

After reviewing the study, Kirsach said, “The results were stunning.”

“This study is definitive and bulletproof,” he noted.

“They did everything right.”

Kirsch continues by explaining what the findings in Florida mean for the rest of the country.

“Let’s assume, to be super generous, that the Moderna shots are super safe and don’t increase all-cause mortality (ACM) at all,” he writes.

“That’s not true, of course, but this is the best case.

“That means that the Pfizer shots, at a minimum, must increase your ACM by at least 36%.

“So that means that Pfizer, single-handedly, likely killed at least 470,000 Americans if the results in other states are similar to what they found when they looked in Florida.”

The study has ignited renewed concerns over the comparative safety of Covid mRNA “vaccines.”

The analysis involved over 1.4 million carefully matched individuals.

The findings add a significant amount of weight to a growing body of observational research probing potential non-specific effects of “vaccines.”

The investigation was a retrospective, matched cohort study involving 1,470,100 noninstitutionalized adult Florida residents.

The participants had completed a two-dose series of mRNA “vaccines” from either Pfizer (BNT162b2) or Moderna (mRNA-1273) between December 2020 and August 2021.

The researchers matched vaccine recipients 1:1 across seven criteria, including age, sex, race, ethnicity, vaccination site, calendar month of vaccination, and census tract.

The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality within 12 months of receiving the second vaccine dose.

Secondary endpoints included cardiovascular, COVID-19, and non-Covid mortality.

To control for confounding, the study incorporated logistic regression adjusted for census tract-level social vulnerability, ZIP code-level historical mortality rates, and included sensitivity analyses and negative control outcomes (suicide and homicide) to detect unmeasured bias.

In the matched cohort:

• All-cause mortality was significantly higher in Pfizer recipients: 847.2 vs. 617.9 deaths per 100,000 persons (OR 1.384; 95% CI: 1.331–1.439).
• Cardiovascular mortality was also elevated: 248.7 vs. 162.4 deaths per 100,000 (OR 1.540; 95% CI: 1.431–1.657).
• COVID-19 mortality was higher for Pfizer: 55.5 vs. 29.5 deaths per 100,000 (OR 1.882; 95% CI: 1.596–2.220).
• Non-COVID-19 mortality showed a similar pattern (OR 1.356; 95% CI: 1.303–1.412).

The study also bolsters the scientific case for further investigating non-specific effects of “vaccines,” an underexplored domain in modern vaccinology.

Meanwhile, a global push to mass-vaccinate the public for Covid continues, despite the growing body of evidence exposing the dangers of the “vaccines.”

In Canada, the government has begun ramping up testing for a chilling new Covid mRNA “AeroVax” that seeks to overcome “vaccine hesitancy” by using aerosols to “vaccinate” the general public.

Unlike traditional “vaccines” that are deployed using injections, the new AeroVax is an atomized spray that is inhaled.

The new “vaccines” are sprayed in aerosol form and breathed in by recipients.

The AeroVax was developed by researchers at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation-funded McMaster University in Canada.

The scientists developing the experimental “Serova” Covid mRNA “vaccine” insist that it will be administered as a nasal spray.

However, the development of inhaled “vaccines” could allow for large numbers of people to be “vaccinated” at once if the AeroVax were sprayed into the atmosphere.

If the AeroVax were deployed atmospherically, it could “vaccinate” entire towns and cities at once, bypassing individual consent.

Populations could be “vaccinated” without their knowledge under such a scheme.

Source: https://slaynews.com