Showing posts sorted by date for query Hakann. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query Hakann. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Sunday, September 27, 2026

Another day in the life of Hakann


Another day in the life of Hakann

By Aishia

Channel: A. S.

Post on 09/27/2026



Aishia finished her meditation first. Hakann’s wife slowly untangled her hands from his, stretched, and looked lovingly at her still-meditating husband.

The years only seemed to make him more handsome, but they also seemed to weigh on him to such an extent that he was actually slowly aging. He needed uncommonly large amounts of meditation to recover, and was even sleeping sometimes.

That said, she couldn’t love him more deeply or be more proud of him. Hopefully the situation with Earth will be resolved soon -- for everyone’s sake.

She sensed that his stomach was empty and had an idea.

Hakann was hearing some strange noises and asked, “Aishia, are you okay?” Her voice, seductive and nearby, responded in English: “Yes. Come eat your breakfast.”

He opened his eyes: “why are you speaking an Earth language all of a sudden - whoah.” His wife was lying next to him, naked, with his breakfast on her body. “Why? Because the “eat breakfast / eat me out” pun doesn’t work in our language, my beloved.” He grinned and started kissing her.

After a blissful, timeless period, Hakann went to work and psychically split himself into six beings, going to several locations at once to get more accomplished.

Hakann 1

She sobbed against his chest and he hugged her.

“I am so sorry. I know that it’s not enough, but I promise you I will arrest the person responsible for Traysher’s murder.”

She sobbed a while longer, and then asked Hakann: “what do you mean? You just said there was a battle, and that some people got saved but that others including my son died. And you said that all the reptilians died in that battle. So you’ve already killed the reptilians responsible for Traysher’s murder, right? “

Hakann could feel her husband’s anger boiling, who asked the critical question: “yes. But how did the reptilians find Traysher and the others in the first place?”

Indeed -- that was the question Hakann had asked a few hours ago. “Hopefully I’ll be able to provide clarity soon. I promise you that I will visit you again tomorrow, in any case. If I’m welcome. As his commander, I am ultimately responsible for your son’s death: if you don’t want to see me again, I understand and can send someone else.”

Traysher’s father swallowed, tears welling in his eyes, then replied: “please come again tomorrow, if you’re able. I appreciate you taking the time to come see us. Thank you.”

Hakann 2

He stepped into the pool and submerged himself.

His mind registered “Welcome Commander Hakann, today...” and then his consciousness merged with the spaceship he was on, including its sentience and all the artificial intelligence on board, plus with the minds of some of his subordinates who were likewise linked up.

For the rest of the day the temporary human - ship - AI hybrid went through countless scenarios, and made several decisions. The ship delivered the data, the artificial intelligence did the calculation, and the human eventually decided and gave the order.

Not everyone was comfortable with doing the mind - machine - AI meld like this, but Hakann was relatively young by Pleiadian Commander standards, and he had already interacted with this technology as he was coming of age. Besides, he couldn’t afford not to do this.

Hakann 3

One of the Arcturian delegates said: “we know that the Ashtar intervention on Earth will still probably happen in Earth year 2026 or in January / February of 2027. But we also know that there’s a non-negligible possibility it gets delayed even more, despite what Ashtar said. We have concerns about that possibility.”

“Ah”, Hakann responded, “unfortunately Ashtar is incredibly busy, but if you specify those concerns then I can see if I can get an audience for you. If not, I would be happy to arrange meetings for you with other people who are close to Ashtar.”

“We have already talked to all the people you’re currently thinking of. In fact, we’re currently talking to the person we intend to talk to: you.”

“Why me? I don’t have a vote on whether the intervention on Earth happens or not.”

“It’s well-known that you’re more pro-intervention, more independent and somewhat more critical of Ashtar than most commanders. So. Of course we all hope that Earth humans sort their own things out soon. Failing that, we’re all hoping that Ashtar will intervene and that it will go well. But what will you personally do, Hakann, if Earth humans don’t sort out their own mess and Ashtar decides to delay again? Because us Arcturians don’t consider that to be an acceptable outcome, if it were to happen.”

“I... must advise you that I’ll report every notable diplomatic interaction I have to someone who reports to Ashtar.”

“We’re counting on it. Now, please answer the question.”

“I... don’t know yet.” Hakann sat down. “Let’s discuss it.”

Hakann 4

Hakann walked into the throne room, glanced at the clearly unmotivated guards, and noticed the king had a gun within reach.

Hakann bowed to the four feet tall person sitting on the throne: “Your majesty. I am happy to talk to you. Of course, I will honor our agreement that people from the galactic confederation will not read the mind of you or any of your people.”

King Aelrred seemed nervous. “Ah, yes. Thank you. I am grateful to have this opportunity to talk with a delegate from the galactic confederation. Now that you’re here -- as you know we’ve recently joined your Confederation. We’re also a small nation with little technology and little psychic ability, and we’re on the border with the reptilian empire. I simply must reiterate my request that we get more access to military technology and psychic warfare technology from the galactic confederation. In particular, the Traex’na technology would do wonders for our defense, and for our relationship. I’m willing to increase this year’s contribution to the galactic confederation in exchange for this technology. If there’s anything you want, name your price.”

“The rules prohibit us from giving you access to more military technology so soon after joining us -- as you knew when you signed the agreement. And Traex’na technology especially is completely off-limits because it’s new -- I don’t think even the reptilians have that technology yet. Still, you have my word that your people will remain protected by the Confederation. To the best of my knowledge, no one of your people has been harmed since you joined the Confederation, although please tell me if I’m misinformed.”

“That is a shame. I do appreciate your protection. Yes, my people have been fine ever since we joined. Now, there was also something you wanted to talk to me about?”

“Yes.” Hakann took two steps forward and his voice became sharper. “Do you even know what reptilians do to their prisoners?”

“What -- how -- what do you mean? Yes. Yes, I know what reptilians do to their prisoners.”

Hakann took another step forward. “Then why did you sell the location of six of my soldiers to the reptilians? And what did you get in return -- Wealth? Technology? DNA? A promise of protection?”

Aelrred drew his gun in a surprisingly swift motion -- but the bullet glanced off Hakann’s personal shield. A heartbeat later and Aelrred’s limbs went limp and the weapon clattered on the floor.

“Aelrred, you are under arrest. I’ll send you to a judge who’ll discuss the charges with you, but even just your attempted murder of a Confederation delegate -- myself -- is easily enough to convict you. You will spend the rest of your life in a Pleiadian labor camp. If you ever want to see your homeworld again, that will be a difficult and long road, but you’ll be given the opportunity to reform yourself and possibly earn your freedom. One of those steps will be personally apologizing to the families you’ve destroyed.”

Hakann gave a command and Aelrred was teleported out.

One of the guards stuttered and finally asked: “uh... what do we do now? Because we’re used to following the king, and even though we didn’t like him very much and didn’t think he was very wise -- well you just arrested him, and he has no living children.”

Hakann turned to him: “you’re welcome to stay in the galactic confederation -- our problem was with Aelrred’s actions, not with you as a people. I guess the next decision your people will have to make is: are you sure you want to remain a kingdom? I can send some people over to advise you, if you wish -- it’s up to your people to decide your future.”

Another guard hesitantly said: “but... well, part of Aelrred’s concern was that the evil empires are just more powerful than the galactic confederation. Are -- are we allowed to reconsider which side we want to be on? Obviously the reptilians are monstrous and horrible, but we also don’t want to become their victims.”

Hakann turned to him: “If you side with the reptilians, and the galactic confederation stands, then you’ll have chosen the more monstrous and less generous side for no reason. And if you side with the reptilians and the galactic confederation falls, then all you’ve accomplished is that you’re enslaved last. I’ll ask those Pleiadian advisors to also discuss this with your people. But yes, you are allowed to leave our confederation if you wish. We hope you don’t, but we won’t stop you.”

“What exactly is your plan to deal with the reptilians and others?”

“Their number of ships doesn’t say everything. Yes, in total the negative races have a larger fleet, but they’re all out for themselves -- which is why they haven’t launched a coordinated, all-out attack in a very long time. They simply can’t. Their empires are inherently unstable and divided. Meanwhile, we’re able to deploy literally every Confederation ship we have, if necessary, with one unified vision. Plus, if all goes well, we’re about to have powerful new allies: Earth humans.”

The guard raised his eyebrows: “what use are they? They’re as primitive as we are, and you just demonstrated that our weapons can’t hurt you while you can psychically paralyze us in a second.”

“Our shields don’t have an infinite capacity. Well, Earth humans have an absurdly high psychic potential, plius an integrated mastery of the light and dark. They’ll need a lot of help and development and mentorship, but they’re going to surprise you in the upcoming years.”

Hakann 5

“Congratulations on having completed your training.” Hakann looked with pride at the military graduates gathered before him.

“Now it’s time for you to choose the group you want to be a part of. As you know, if an Earth intervention is ordered, then I am one of the commanders who will take part in that. If you join me or one of the other commanders assigned to Earth, then there is a chance that a few Earth months from now you will be ordered to help physically liberate Earth. It is a once-in-a-lifetime experience, and we can use all the hands we can get, but it is also risky. We’ll assign the most dangerous missions to veterans, but still, it would be substantially safer for you to not join my group, and just join a garrison or a patrol fleet somewhere.”

As Hakann continued, he looked across the crowd, and one face twisted his stomach a little bit.

After the speech, he visited Tunia. She greeted him: “Ah, great to see you again Hakann. How have you been?”

“Hello, Tunia. I was giving my usual speech to the military graduates and your son was in the crowd, listening to my speech.”

“Ah, indeed. He looks up to you, and he wants to help the people of Earth. It won’t surprise me if he’ll apply to join your group.”

“I... are you okay with that?”

“Yes, I am. No mother wants to see her son risk his life, but it’s his choice to go into the military -- he wants to protect and help people -- and I couldn’t dream of a better commander for him to join than you.”

Hakann swallowed.

Tunia continued: “However, would you be okay with him joining you? Given that we’re friends, and that you know my son pretty well already?”

Hakann slowly shook his head. “No. I would not be okay with that. I know that every soldier has loved ones, but I can’t be swayed in my decision-making by my personal emotions, when decisions have to be made in a second and lives are on the line. If he insists on helping liberate Earth, he can join one of the other commanders involved in that.”

Tunia nodded. “I understand. I’ll go tell him when he gets home that he can’t join your group.”

“No, I’ll tell him myself. Well, let’s tell him together.”

Hakann 6

“Can we skip this meeting? You have no idea how much work still needs to be done.”

Hakann’s spiritual mentor smiled serenely at him. “You know as well as I do that these sessions are helpful and important, even though they take time. But fine -- face that thing that I can see sitting on your heart, that you really don’t want to face, and we can end this meeting early.”

“There is nothing that I haven’t faced.”

She looked at him.

“Okay, okay. I’m concerned for the people of Earth.”

She looked at him.

“Fine. You got me. I made a mistake, and some people I’m responsible for have died because of that. And arguably I’m spending too much time on individual soldiers and I should just delegate their cases and not personally concern myself with individual dead soldiers.”

She looked at him.

He paced around the room, started telepathically sending something, stopped, paced some more. Then he looked at her. “I... am I doing enough? Is it enough? I know people are dying and suffering horribly everywhere, all around me, and I -- am I doing enough?”

She rose and embraced him.

Evening

The six Hakanns merged into one again, and at home he saw that his now-adult children had come to visit him. One of them brought Hakann’s granddaughter with her. Hakann’s heart filled with love, and he spent a peaceful evening with his family.


A. S.


Compiled by http://violetflame.biz.ly from:

You are loved


Friday, August 21, 2026

Becoming angry can be spiritual progress


Becoming angry can be spiritual progress

By Hakann

Channel: A. S.

Post on 2026/08/21



My dearest brothers and sisters,

This is Hakann speaking. I greet you in peace and love.

It is so good to be able to talk to you again.

My thanks to this channeler for giving me this opportunity once again. And thanks to you for tuning in: it gladdens my heart that many of you are still wanting to connect to us Pleiadians.

Tunia will likely get the next channeling, which may be next week, or whenever this channeler feels up to it again. The messages might also be slightly shorter so as not to not overburden this channeler.

On to today’s topic:

Today I want to make a distinction between ego-defending anger versus righteous anger.

The most common form of anger on your world is ego-defending anger. For example, someone says something true or at least fair to John, and John gets emotionally upset. And instead of introspecting or feeling his emotions or communicating, John gets angry.

Ego-defending anger is why anger has a bad reputation on your world. Because of course, John’s anger isn’t productive here. It would be better if he didn’t get angry and he would introspect or feel or communicate instead.

However, there’s also righteous anger, which is where you get upset or angry at genuine unfairness or genuine mistreatment of you or someone else. And that’s actually useful, because it can motivate you to get moving, to take action, to stand up for yourself or others, to set boundaries, to demand reasonable treatment.

Furthermore, people actually respect righteous anger when it’s genuine and justified.

Going from passivity to righteous anger can actually be a substantial spiritual improvement. After all, righteous anger is a whole lot better than just passively letting yourself get mistreated.

One can make the argument that righteous anger isn’t the highest state of being. Well, I think people overvalue “acting like a buddha” and undervalue authenticity and truth and acting spontaneously. And also, you probably can’t go from passivity straight to buddha-hood without being righteously angry for a while, expressing and feeling that and standing up for yourself or others.

That said, it’s still important to have enough self-control that even if you’re righteously angry, you’re not violent, you’re not screaming at people, the words you say remain justified, et cetera.

Not every situation is appropriate for righteous anger. Righteous anger also can’t solve everything.

Still, if you find yourself being more angry now than you were in the past, it can be a spiritual improvement.

Just make sure you’re not actually having ego-defending anger and labeling that as righteous anger. That’s an ego trap and that of course wouldn’t be helpful.

With all my love,

Your star brother,

Hakann

A. S.


Compiled by http://violetflame.biz.ly from:

You are loved


Friday, May 8, 2026

How many legs does your self-value rest on?


How many legs does your self-value rest on?

Hakann via channel A. S.

Posted on May 8, 2026

 

My dearest brothers and sisters,

This is Hakann speaking. I greet you in peace and love.

Suppose some person’s sense of self-value only has one “leg” to stand on. Namely: their sense of self-value is propped up by only the fact that they’re an active political activist, or only the fact that they’re a great athlete, or that they’re a great parent, or that they’re spiritually advanced, et cetera.

In this case, if that one leg gets knocked out from under them, their self value falls painfully to the floor. For example:

- if someone’s self-value rests on the fact that they’re a political activist and “fighting evil” (the other political side), then they may become very unreasonable in political debates, demonizing the enemy side and refusing to acknowledge their side’s flaws. This can contribute to a country’s political polarization or culture war.

- a great athlete may become obsessive about their sport to strengthen that one leg their self-value rests on, becoming truly amazing at the sport in the process. However if that great athlete gets seriously ill, their self-value may fall to the ground unless they can find a new leg to stand on.

- if someone’s self value only rests on “I’m a great parent”, then they may be completely unwilling to listen to genuine criticisms / grievances their child may have for parenting mistakes they made.

- if the spiritual person buys into an unhelpful concept or ideology, and it gets pointed out to them, they may not want to accept that. In fact they may engage in performative spirituality or denial of reality to “strengthen their leg” (get more self-value reinforcement)

However, now suppose that someone has at least two legs to stand on. Now suddenly they can admit that they, or their side made serious mistakes -- because even if one of their legs is temporarily knocked out from under them, their self-value still doesn’t fall to the floor. It’s simply resting on the other leg for a while.

Now yes, ideally, someone’s self-value can actually levitate: it remains high no matter what happens, no matter how they’re treated, no matter what disappointments they face.

A very few people’s self-value can levitate, and for those people that’s absolutely fantastic.

However this is very rare. And most people can’t just choose to have their self-value levitate. [Channeler’s note: my self-value can’t levitate yet.]

What’s far more common is that someone thinks their self-value can levitate, but actually it can’t; and they simply refuse to acknowledge or even see flaws in the leg they actually are standing on, because they depend on that leg. This is the person who denies the very obvious reality that most other people can see. Or this is the person who buys into hyperbolic, good-sounding ideas that fall apart if you think about them critically.

So. Unless you’re one of the few whose self value can levitate, try to have at least two legs that your self value can stand on. In the context of this spiritual community, that means: it’s fine to mostly focus on spirituality if you wish, but I wouldn’t have it as the only leg your self value is standing on. In other words: develop some “non-spiritual” skill, go contribute in some “non-spiritual” way, et cetera.

Yes, this spiritual message is suggesting that you become good at something “non-spiritual” or contribute in some “non-spiritual” way too. Balance is underrated. Also, you can do “non-spiritual” things in a “spiritual” way too, and there are plenty of lessons to be learned in the “normal” outside world.

Just consuming something non-spiritual is fine, but not sufficient: if you’re only standing on your one spirituality leg, then a nice holiday is great but you may still feel threatened in your self-worth if afterwards someone disagrees with a spiritual view you have.

Also, if your two legs are “I am spiritually advanced” and “I have a spiritual business” then you still really only have one leg: spirituality. (Or if you prefer, you can think of those two legs as being tied together.) This still leaves you unstable and open to spiritual ego, to blindness to wrong beliefs you might have, to possible performative spirituality, etc.

This also means that even if someone else is blatantly and very obviously wrong, you’re not going to be able to point that out to them if that’s the only “leg” their self value is standing on. They’re arguing for their “survival”; you can’t talk them out of their “survival instinct.”

Have compassion for this.

And if someone is trying to get you to only stand on one leg -- them -- that’s a red flag. This is how cults (or controlling partners) operate: “cut off contact with your friends, they’re only holding you back; quit your job and come work for us / me.” And then the cult (controlling partner) becomes your only leg and it becomes really hard to even see flaws in that one leg, let alone leave.

Finally, legs do need to be at least somewhat strong to actually support you. If you dabble in twenty things and never really commit to anything or become really good at anything, you’ll have twenty very weak, wobbly legs. That’s not solid footing either. Most people will benefit from having 2-3 legs that are really solid, either with or without a clear primary focus on one leg. (Young adults or people in survival mode might need to focus strongly on one leg for a while.)

Yes, there are stories of the person who focused 100% on spirituality and became enlightened, but for every such person there are five hundred cases where the singularly focused spiritual seeker got lost and was unable to see that. After all, if someone is standing on just one leg, it’s really hard for them to see flaws in that leg. It’s still fine to focus mostly on spirituality, if you wish: I just suggest a bit of balance.

I hope this was helpful.

With all my love,

Your star brother,

Hakann
A. S.



If you want to learn about a useful healing modality, please see https://channelings.substack.com/p/hakann-onion-healing

If you want to help design the society of the future, please see https://eraoflight.com/2026/01/04/ashtar-our-new-commitment/

Compiled by http://violetflame.biz.ly from: 

Saturday, April 25, 2026

Fear leads to a desire for control


Fear leads to a desire for control

Hakann via channel A. S.

Posted on April 25, 2026

 
My dearest brothers and sisters,

This is Hakann speaking. I greet you in peace and love.

On your world, many people are scared -- for very understandable reasons.

Now, reality is nuanced, there are a lot of factors, people are different and people have free will.

Still, in people who aren’t embodying the knowledge that they’re really a reincarnating soul, fear often leads to a desire for control.

Even somewhat subtle fears, such as fear of death or “fear of being forgotten after death” or “fear that I will keep being unhappy”, can lead to a desire for control.

A dramatic expression of this desire for control is someone who is a dictator, or a dark controller (our word for the cabal / black hats).

A somewhat dramatic expression of this desire for control is the overly controlling, sometimes abusive parent or partner or boss. Or it’s the power-seeking politician. Or it’s the person who enforces censorship over other people, or who character assassinates someone.

A subtle expression of this desire for control is the average person who labels a statement as “a conspiracy theory, therefore definitely false” even if they haven’t researched it and don’t have genuine intuition about it. They’re trying to control reality and other people’s beliefs and perceptions by just claiming that something is definitely false, with no valid reason. Why? Because the world is less scary if others believe as they do.

Similarly there’s a spiritual person claiming “this doesn’t resonate with me, therefore it’s false” or “this resonates with me, therefore it’s true” if that “resonance” is based on emotions or biases, and not genuine intuition. (Of course, “this resonates with me, there I believe it’s true” isn’t control-seeking and is fine.)

Or other expressions where a spiritual person claims that something is a fact (or is factually false) based on their spiritual knowing, if that spiritual knowing is actually just what they emotionally want to be true.

That said, if the “resonance” is genuine intuition, then it’s not control-seeking; then it’s just fact and valid public service to share that.

So yes, it’s a thin line. And yes, often people seeking control think they’re doing a good thing, e.g. they think they’re doing a public service by sharing their genuine intuition. When they’re really just subconsciously trying to control other people’s perception by sharing their emotions and presenting that as “proof by genuine intuition.”

There are many other forms of seeking control, such as:

- “I emotionally want this to be true, and look this source says it’s true, therefore it’s objectively true. That other, equally-reliable source that says it’s false? I’m not going to mention it, or I’ll slander that source.” This controls other people’s beliefs and perceptions.

- performative spirituality: putting on a show to control someone’s perception of your level of spiritual development.

- strawmanning someone’s position (publicly saying that someone else’s position is X, and it’s wrong because of Y, when their position isn’t X at all)

- or “my group is especially oppressed” if that isn’t true. It’s a fear-based attempt to control other people into treating you better, not through merit or any solid argument, but through guilt.

- “you are harming this group / this ideal, therefore you must change” if the person isn’t actually harming them, or if that person is simply speaking the unflattering truth.

- or “you’re making me feel horrible, therefore you must change.”

- or a stance of: “if something bad happens to another person, that’s soul choice / karma / a good opportunity to learn / they’re meant to experience that. But if something bad happens to me, then that’s an injustice that shouldn’t have happened.” (Trying to control other people’s perceptions in a way that’s unfairly biased towards you.)

- or “if others are struggling, they shouldn’t complain and should instead work on themselves and move forward. But if I’m struggling, I want you to listen to how tough I have it.”

- or “that person is doing really well, therefore you should get your act together (but I wouldn’t accept that argument if it was applied to me).”

- or “I have it just as tough as that other group” if that other group clearly has it tougher.

- or “look, you’re clearly biased here (and I’m not going to mention that I’m equally biased, I’m going to pretend that I’m the objective one).”

- or “you’re pushing an agenda, I’m simply interested in the truth (when really I’m pushing my agenda just as hard)”

- or “the reason for my belief is obviously that it’s the truth and that I’m well-informed / intuitive / moral. The reason that you disagree is obviously a character defect or bias or lack of knowledge / intuition / morality on your end.”

- or “if it seems logical to me or resonates with me, that’s objective proof. If it seems illogical to you or doesn’t resonate with you, that’s not objective proof, you’re probably just being biased and you need to provide actual evidence.”

- or excessively focusing on acquiring wealth, status, rational knowledge, etc, which gives an illusion of “being in control.”

Unfortunately, a whole lot of people, including “normal” people who aren’t power-hungry politicians, engage in control-seeking behaviors.

Now let’s look at some non-control seeking expressions:

- “I don’t know”

- or “I don’t know, here’s a solid argument in favor and here’s a solid argument against”

- or “I resonate with this, therefore I think it’s this”

- or “I’ve done a whole lot of research, I’m pretty sure it’s this”

- or “this resonates with me, it’s true” when that’s indeed genuine intuition, and the speaker is advanced enough to know the difference between “it resonates because I emotionally like it” vs “it resonates because my intuition genuinely confirms it.”

- or “I’m in pain”

- or “this hurts me”

- or “I’m afraid”

- or “I feel...” (without weaponizing it or turning it into an implication that others should change)

- or “I was wrong”

- or “I’m sorry”

- or empowering / supporting others

- or “others have it worse than myself”

- or “yes I am biased / privileged”

- or “you are better at this than I am”

- or speaking the truth without a control seeking agenda behind it

- or genuinely listening to someone else, without an agenda

Note that people tend to really like and become less stressed when other people make non-control seeking statements such as this. Whereas people tend to become uncomfortable when others seek control. In that way, fear propagates.

There was a time when this channeler gave connection workshops, where he had exercises that encouraged strangers to genuinely listen and be vulnerable towards each other, in a safe way, after some initial exercises. Multiple relationships came out of that. Once people met for the first time during that workshop, and very shortly after the workshop ended they started kissing each other. A genuinely non-control seeking attitude is quite rare, and other people love it.

So. Almost certainly there have been times in your life where you were scared and desired control, at least to some extent.

I’m not saying that you necessarily desired to become a dictator. However, if you shared your opinion and the other person rejected it, yet you still want them to believe or behave differently, that’s a desire for control (so long as we’re not talking about “I want that person to stop assaulting me / others.” Directly harming another is not okay.)

Some people will argue “I don’t want control, I just want that person to improve their life / act in a way that’s better for society.” If that person has already rejected your suggestion, then that is a desire for control. It’s not actually for the highest good to want to override someone else’s free will for the “greater good.”

It’s fine to undertake initiatives yourself to improve society, but if you can’t emotionally handle for example the other political side acting in a way that you think is bad, then that’s an issue for you to work through. And sure, if you wish, you can vote or become a politician yourself or have political debates.

If you think you can’t have a good life unless others change, well, to an extent that may be true, but you also may be underestimating your ability to create a good life if you consistently put in self-improvement or self-healing work. Plus you might be excessively attached to your current incarnation, which is understandable, but ultimately you’re a reincarnating soul.

Your name doesn’t refer to the real you.

Notice the sneakiness of the desire for control: it often comes in through the back door and typically pretends that you simply want to change things for the greater good, or that you just want to speak truth, or that you’re simply being rational, or that you just want to help out your group (but you’re doing so at the expense of other groups who need help just as much).

A desire for control is especially hard to resist if a significant group of other people genuinely wants you to have control, because you’re pushing something they like or agree with or think will help them.

A whole lot of people succumb to the temptation to seize control if enough people want them to.

Leaders nearly always become controlling once they’re in power, even if they started out with good intentions. It’s really hard to resist the ego logic of: “that group of people wants me to be in control to make things right, therefore I need to be in control for the greater good, and hence I need to maintain and protect and increase my control, because after all I’m one of the few good ones. If I do bad things for power, that’s a regrettable necessity to keep a good person, i.e. me, in charge.”

In turn, leaders very rarely make decisions that reduce their control, even if those decisions would be obviously good for the people. Because after all, a group of people loves them, therefore they’re a great leader, therefore they need to be in control and be powerful in order to do good things, therefore they can’t truly empower the people -- many of whom are bad, after all.

A person’s rational mind is always there to provide good-sounding rationalizations for the desire for control.

This is a trap the gray hats are in: they started out with good intentions. Then seeking control genuinely seemed like the good thing to do, to steer the world in the right direction. And now they don’t really want to liberate Earth and empower the people, because that would reduce their control. Because they’re good and the people are bad, right? So how could they, the good ones, give up control and empower the people, i.e. the bad ones?

I get that this makes the gray hats sound like black hats, but the gray hats aren’t trying to kill most of the population and enslave the rest. That is a significant difference.

Conversely, remember Cincinnatus, the Roman aristocrat who was granted absolute power in Rome to deal with an emergency? He dealt with the problem, and then sixteen days later he willingly stepped down and returned to his farm.

Similarly, Washington could have become a quasi-king, but he refused.

The reason Cincinnatus’s and Washington’s stories are so powerful, and that we’re still talking about these long-dead people, is that they’re examples of people who willingly gave up control. And that’s rare, as illustrated by how legendary and resonant these stories are.

In most other situations, people have to be pressured out of their positions of control by mechanisms such as their term coming to an end. If clinging on to control means that pretty much everyone would see them as a dictator, then keeping control is much less tempting. Control only becomes really tempting if a sizable group of people cheers you on for doing so.

The gray hats -- and bureaucrats, and black hats -- don’t have a term of office. They have no natural point in time that nudges them out of their positions of control.

Even Cincinnatus and Washingtons, paragons of giving up their control, still really like their control.

Cincinnatus was an aristocrat, living in a society where the law in practice heavily favored aristocrats. He opposed reforms that would have limited arbitrary aristocratic legal power, thus protecting his unfair privilege. So the archetypal figure of giving up control for the greater good... still protected the unfair control of his own social class.

Similarly, despite “all men are created equal”, Washington failed to do as much as he could have for women and for slaves.

People really, REALLY like their control -- especially if a sizable group of people cheers on their control.

And in a less dramatic way, this is a trap for modern spiritual people as well. If they grab control by just making a claim without sufficient research or intuition to back that up, and it’s a claim that appeals to a sizable group of people who’ll cheer them on, then that’s a very egoically tempting claim to make. Of course, the rational mind is always there to rationalize that we’re just spreading the truth.

Which is why you see a lot of people say “this is true” or “that is false” as if those are objective facts, often dressed up in spiritual language -- even though those people don’t have the knowledge or intuition to really know those things for certain.

How do we address the desire for control?

Doing your spiritual work eventually lets you stop identifying with your current incarnation, which takes the sting out of fear.

“Whatever arises, observe that.” That lets you develop genuine self-insight in the medium term.

If you find the part of you that wants control, observe it.

Offer help once and share your opinion once, and then let others make their choices. Even if people are clearly making mistakes, let them make their mistakes -- don’t try to control them.

In situations where you haven’t done research or have genuine intuition, you can have an opinion but don’t cling too tightly on to it, and don’t present it as fact.

Do internal work, heal and get your own life in order. If you feel good about yourself and you’re doing well, you might not desire control.

I hope this was helpful.

With all my love,

Your star brother,

Hakann

A. S.



If you want to learn about a useful healing modality, please see https://channelings.substack.com/p/hakann-onion-healing

If you want to help design the society of the future, please see https://eraoflight.com/2026/01/04/ashtar-our-new-commitment/
Compiled by http://violetflame.biz.ly from: 

Saturday, April 18, 2026

To become high-vibration, don't focus on being high-vibration


To become high-vibration, don't focus on being high-vibration

Hakann via channel A. S.

Posted on April 17, 2026

 
My dearest brothers and sisters,

This is Hakann speaking. I greet you in peace and love.

We’re going to do last week’s message again, but now for being high-vibration instead of happy. The same logic applies.

Many spiritual people take the following approach:

- First make sure you have a functional life, where your needs are met and all major problems are taken care of.

- Then focus on being high-vibration.

The problem with this is that if the average person focuses on being “high-vibration”, they try to take the seeming direct path towards it, and they do things such as:

- focus on thinking positively (which doesn’t help if the subconscious is filled with “negative” or limiting thoughts; the subconscious manifests things too)

- turn a blind eye to darker, more painful things, i.e. be willfully blind

- turn a blind eye to people in need, i.e. be in a narcissistic bubble

- refuse to enter challenging or “beneath me as a spiritual person” type of situations or environments where they actually may have been able to contribute or grow

- refuse to see their own shadow or trauma or admit fault or imperfections, because seeing that feels “low-vibration”, even though that’s crucial for growth

This way, the spiritual seeker can actually slow down their spiritual growth in some cases. And it can grow their spiritual ego.

What I suggest that you do instead is:

- First make sure you have a functional life, where your needs are met and all major problems are taken care of.

- Then focus on improving yourself or on contributing. Be authentic. And if something arises in you, observe that; this purifies your subconscious over time.

Doing this doesn’t feel as good or look as good at first, but in the medium term it will do more to improve your vibration than trying to take the seeming direct path towards a high vibration.

I hope this was helpful.

And if you’re currently in deep pain or have severe problems: I am sorry, and you are in my thoughts. My heart goes out to you, and not a day goes by where I’m not thinking about the people of Earth, or actively working towards helping you. Yes, in small and covert and preparatory ways for now -- but the future ahead of you really is very bright. That can’t be changed.

And in the meantime, you can still improve your life.

With all my love,

Your star brother,

Hakann

A. S.



If you want to learn about a useful healing modality, please see https://channelings.substack.com/p/hakann-onion-healing

If you want to help design the society of the future, please see https://eraoflight.com/2026/01/04/ashtar-our-new-commitment/
Compiled by http://violetflame.biz.ly from: 

Saturday, April 11, 2026

To become happy, don't aim for happiness


To become happy, don't aim for happiness

Hakann via channel A. S.

Posted on April 11, 2026

 
My dearest brothers and sisters,

This is Hakann speaking. I greet you in peace and love.

Many people take the following approach:

- First make sure you have a functional life, where your needs are met and all major problems are taken care of.

- Then try to find happiness.

But the problem is that when people directly aim for happiness, typically that leads to them consuming things, or pursuing short-term pleasure, or collecting physical things or money, or just repeatedly doing what is comfortable or fun or dopamine-providing in the moment. Which doesn’t provide inherent, lasting happiness.

Instead, the way to truly become happy is to not aim for happiness.

What I suggest that you do instead is:

- First make sure you have a functional life, where your needs are met and all major problems are taken care of.

- Then focus on improving yourself or on contributing.

So the first point is unchanged.

The second point can be anything from meditating, to going to a psychologist, to learning a new skill, to getting better at an existing skill, to creating something, to doing volunteer work, to doing a small act of kindness, to improving one of your routines, to observing whatever arises.

You absolutely don’t need to do all of these, but it’s a good idea to do one or two of these.

You also don’t need to go overboard and spend huge amounts of time and energy on improving yourself or contributing. The base of the pyramid is still making sure you have a functional life and your needs are taken care of. Likely that will take most of your time and energy (and in certain periods, possibly even all of your time and energy). That’s okay.

Also, self-improvement takes time. If you feel you progress slowly, well, you’re still progressing. You’re still investing in yourself. Not everyone is.

If you focus on improving yourself or contributing, then in time you will find happiness, rooted in the excellence of the skills you’ve built, rooted in your feeling of competence and agency, rooted in the contributions you’ve made.

Which is a much more lasting, inherent, enduring, meaningful kind of happiness than the kind of “happiness” you get from consumption or just by constantly focusing on doing fun things.

Plus it’s much better for the world if people focus on self-improvement and contribution, rather than on consumption.

I hope this was helpful.

With all my love,

Your star brother,

Hakann

A. S.



If you want to learn about a useful healing modality, please see https://channelings.substack.com/p/hakann-onion-healing

If you want to help design the society of the future, please see https://eraoflight.com/2026/01/04/ashtar-our-new-commitment/
Compiled by http://violetflame.biz.ly from: 

Monday, April 6, 2026

Do others share your definition of spiritual terms?


Do others share your definition of spiritual terms?

Hakann via channel A. S.

Posted on April 6, 2026

 
My dearest brothers and sisters,

This is Hakann speaking. I greet you in peace and love.

What does the term “enlightenment” mean?

Well, let’s say that John over here believes that enlightenment means: “freedom from the cycle of rebirth.” Most likely John thinks that this is the sole definition of enlightenment, and John thinks that everyone shares his definition (except maybe a few people who are simply wrong).

However, let’s say Anna believes that enlightenment means something else, such as say “the attainment of the natural state.” And likely Anna believes that this is the sole definition of enlightenment.

And let’s say Julianne believes that enlightenment means “liberation from suffering.” And likely she believes that this is the sole definition of enlightenment.

And then there are a bunch of other people having yet other definitions, such as:

“a state of complete inner peace”

“embodying the knowledge that you’re a reincarnating soul, and not just a body and a brain.”

“full awareness of reality”

“the ability to see through illusions”

“a state of complete integration, including of the shadow”

“an end of identification”

“embodying the principle that all is one, and accepting everything”

“non-resistance to everything”

“nonduality (no separation between observer and the observed)”

“integration of the truth of no-self”

So here you have the curious situation that a whole lot of people use one term to refer to slightly different things. They’re all convinced that everyone else agrees with their personal definition, when in reality those other people think that everyone else agrees with THEIR personal definition.

Sometimes it’s fine to use spiritual terms to point to “something roughly over there.” Sometimes that’s completely fine, and being very precise would just mean wasting words.

However, if you’re having precise discussions about enlightenment or other spiritual terms, it becomes important to actually share your definition of the terms with other people. Otherwise you might end up talking past each other.

Even if you’re convinced that you have the sole true definition of enlightenment, it can still prevent miscommunications if you just state your definition whenever you’re having an in-depth discussion about enlightenment. Because even if others have a wrong definition in mind, well, why not help them by sharing your definition with them?

Additionally, if you’re intellectually honest and you study a lot of enlightened people, you might find that it’s not actually that easy to give a definition for enlightenment.

If you give me your definition of enlightenment, I can probably point to someone who fits your definition but that most people wouldn’t agree is enlightened; or I can point to someone who most people would say is enlightened yet doesn’t fit your definition.

And if your definition is so unmeasurable or unfalsifiable that I can’t do this, then your definition isn’t very useful.

If you have a definition of enlightenment that can’t be practically checked (e.g. freedom from the cycle of rebirth), then most likely you still believe that this person is enlightened and that person isn’t, even though you can’t know that via your own definition.

In that case, what you’re likely doing is publicly stating that the definition of enlightenment is such and such, but then you actually evaluate others by whether you personally feel they’re enlightened. Or by whether they satisfy a few specific, measurable criteria. And then you actually have a measurable definition for enlightenment -- but it’s one that doesn’t sound very good or is easy to criticize, and so you hide behind a better-sounding, more formal definition.

And it’s more complicated by the fact that unenlightened people are often worse than they think at judging whether another person is enlightened.

Part of the confusion is that enlightenment is thought of as that stage you reach after a lot of spiritual growth. However, spiritual growth is an imprecisely defined term itself.

People use the term “spiritual growth” as if it’s a one-dimensional path, where you first do this, then you encounter that, then you do these five things, and then you’re enlightened.

It’s more accurate to think of spiritual growth as having sub-categories. Namely: there’s how loving someone is, there’s someone’s skill at seeing things as they really are, how much spiritual knowledge someone has, how compassionate they are, how much peace of mind they have, how many so-called supernatural abilities they have, how pleasant their energy is, how much self-insight they have, et cetera.

And if you map all those categories onto a single scale called “spiritual growth”, and then you create another imprecise term on top of that called “enlightenment” for a certain stage of “spiritual growth”... then you can see the confusion.

This doesn’t mean that you need to stop using these terms. Sometimes they’re accurate enough, and being very precise would just be inefficient.

However this means that you should be aware that for example spiritual growth has sub-categories, and that not everyone who uses the term “spiritually advanced” means the same thing.

Ideally you’d have a whole bunch of terms that describe specific forms of spiritual attainment, and you wouldn’t just use one term “enlightenment” to refer to anyone who is exceptionally good in any spiritual subcategory.

Next up: some people think that all Pleiadians are the equivalent of Earth ascended masters. However Tunia recently said that we’re not. So, which is true?

Well, in some subcategories of spirituality, even the average Pleiadian is very advanced. The average Pleiadian is loving, has peace of mind and has a pleasant energy. Most likely you would love to interact with them.

Whereas in some subcategories of spirituality, even advanced Pleiadians are not at the level of Earth ascended masters.

Although obviously Pleiadians are individuals, in general you can have a pretty good idea of what we’re are like just by thinking how Earth humans would be if they were raised in a safe, loving, abundant, high-tech, high-information, cloistered, almost ivory-tower like environment with little external pressure on them to grow and develop.

Advanced Pleiadians are people who were raised in that environment and who chose to spend a lot of time meditating, introspecting and becoming very good and experienced at some occupation.

Some of you think: “you Pleiadians have spaceships and psychic abilities and are loving, therefore you must be spiritually advanced, therefore you must be wise enough that you’re always making the right decisions, including when it comes to when you’ll intervene or land.”

However “spiritual advancement” is an imprecise term. In reality we’re very advanced in some areas, and not so much in others.

I’ve come to believe that us Pleiadians are simply not very spiritually advanced in the subcategory of understanding what life is like on harsh worlds (such as Earth).

Us Pleiadians are like houses with a very strong foundation (because we were raised with love, safety and abundance). And if something painful happens to us (say, our father dies), then that’s like a broken window.

That broken window is painful but also not that big of a deal. We just repair the window, by getting some healing, doing some observation, working through the emotions, et cetera.

Hence many Pleiadians have the attitude that intervention / landing isn’t yet necessary. Instead we’ll just give you some subtle covert help, some channeled messages filled with love and maybe a few meditation techniques. And then you can fix your own broken window, right? Just meditate. Just take productive action.

However, Earth humans aren’t like houses with a very strong foundation that happen to have a broken window. Instead many of you have never had a strong foundation, because you’ve never been raised in love and safety and abundance.

And a person who’s always had a strong foundation yet who’s had a window broken, just fundamentally doesn’t understand what life is like for a person who’s never had a proper foundation. Those two things are just fundamentally incomparable.

Yes, theoretically people can repair their own foundations, but that requires a lot of time, energy, resources, etc. Us Pleiadians are used to having those, but many of you don’t. So it’s like some of you have a wound that just keeps bleeding.

This makes it profoundly unfair for many Pleiadians to have the attitude that you should just repair your own windows -- because that’s a fundamental misdiagnosis of what’s actually going on.

So, I think there’s a solid argument to be made for the view that we should just intervene or land already.

That said, there genuinely are valid arguments for waiting too.

I’ve changed my mind and nowadays if I was in charge, I think I’d order an immediate intervention / landing by us galactics. However, this isn’t a black-and-white situation, and I wouldn’t say that the plan of Ashtar’s council to only intervene / land at the end of this year is wrong. It’s a different choice, it’s one that I would no longer make, but that doesn’t mean it’s wrong.

Arguments in favor of and against a short-term intervention can’t be mapped on a one-dimensional scale. So it’s not like a financial calculation where the gains are in dollars, and the losses are in dollars, and you can easily compare them.

Instead, the arguments in favor of and against a short-term intervention are so different, they’re in such different units, that it’s hard to compare them. So it’s hard to say that one position is simply objectively wrong. (If you’re curious about the arguments against a short-term intervention, see previous message “Ashtar: Our new commitment”.)

Finally: even your name is an imprecise term. It’s a useful shorthand, but technically it refers to a unified “person” that doesn’t actually exist.

Instead, you’re a reincarnating soul. And your current incarnation (what you’re experiencing) is a bundle of body parts, biological processes, habits, emotions, thoughts, etc. But this is really more of a (changing) bundle than it is one unified “person.”

This is the realization of “no-self”: that if you look inside, you’ll find that there is no “person” there, there’s just a combination of biological processes, etc.

On Earth sometimes the analogy is used that if you take apart a chariot, then there is nothing left. There is no “chariot” that remains after you remove the wheels, the poles, the seat, etc.

This can help make you much less fearful -- because if there’s no person, then what is there to worry about?

Who is there to protect?

Who is the one that needs to attain wealth and status?

Who is the person that must make sure others like them?

Who is the person that dies after 90 years?

Now yes sure, even if you integrate the realization of “no self”, there can still be an experience of pain afterwards. It’s just that there’s no “person” there that is suffering. There can be pain; there is no “oh no, I’ll be in this much pain forever, I can’t take it, why does this always happen to me?”

And yes, of course it’s fundamentally silly that I used the word “you” while arguing that you don’t really exist (other than as a bundle of biological processes etc). However, as we discussed, imprecise terms like “you” are still useful. It’s not really practical to communicate without ever referring to people or using “I” and “you.”

Sure, you could try to use other terms and descriptions instead of saying “I.” But if you want to communicate with any level of efficiency, most likely you’d just create a different, less efficient term that’s ultimately still imprecise. And you wouldn’t really gain anything.

So feel free to keep using spiritual term shorthands. They’re efficient. It’s just good to keep in mind that spiritual attainment has sub-categories, and to clearly define your terms whenever you’re having an in-depth discussion.

So. I hope that was useful.

With all my love,

Your star brother,

A bundle of biological processes etc referred to as “Hakann”



If you want to meet like-minded Earth humans, please see https://eraoflight.com/2024/06/19/hakann-local-meetings-for-those-seeking-first-contact-with-benevolent-ets/

If you want to learn about a useful healing modality, please see https://channelings.substack.com/p/hakann-onion-healing

If you want to help design the society of the future, please see https://eraoflight.com/2026/01/04/ashtar-our-new-commitment/
 

Friday, March 13, 2026

Blunt truths

Blunt truths

By R’Kok

Channel: A. S. 

Received on March 13, 2026, by e-mail
 
 

 
 
Dear Earth humans,

Hakann gave the following rule of thumb: truth first, then love, then freedom.

A great person could probably communicate the truth lovingly, but today you’re stuck with me, a reptilian. At my best moments I’m merely okay.

So I’ll start with the truth and I’ll see if I still have some time left for that whole “love” part near the end. After all, my girlfriend will be back home soon and it’s been like half a day since we last had sex, so I’ll see how far I get with this message until she returns.

If you’re wondering if I would really cut this message short so that I can go bang my Pleiadian girlfriend, then the answer is: yes, absolutely. She’s really hot.

Okay, first blunt truth: us galactics don’t owe you anything. I don’t owe you a full channeled message. Pleiadians don’t owe you a landing or intervention or technology.

If you feel that people owe you something, then the solution is to either look inside, or simply to go build a good life for yourself so that you’re not dependent. Yes, for most people it’s possible to build a good life for themselves, even today.

The people who should take responsibility for the situation on Earth are Earth humans, first and foremost. And if you want to argue that Earth humans can’t solve the situation on Earth -- well then you clearly haven’t discovered your own power, which many galactics would interpret as evidence that you’re not ready to meet us yet.

Some Earth humans think that if everyone on Earth had the consciousness of “galactics, we love you, please land and save us” that we’d land. That’s wrong -- that’s still victim / helplessness consciousness. We can’t meet as equals that way.

We can’t land and meet as equals until enough of you start seeing us as equals -- and if you’d see us as equals, then you would roll up your sleeves and go improve your own situation or level of consciousness or you’d look to help others, rather than asking us.

The minimum that’s needed for galactics to see you as someone who’s not suffering from an acute lack of consciousness is:

- you understand that it’s the responsibility of yourself and Earth humans to improve your own / Earth’s situation

- you’re fine with other people walking their own path and having their own experiences

- you’ve built a life that you’re enjoying to a decent degree

- you understand your power and ability to grow and create better things

- you understand that people are reincarnating souls rather than bodies and brains.

That last point is very important, because that’s how the universe works. Souls often choose to incarnate in situations where they know they’ll suffer, and that’s perfectly fine because the universe is a playground for souls. It’s not a playground for bodies and brains / vehicles / incarnations / what average people think of as “them.”

Ultimately it doesn’t matter if someone’s nervous system fires pain or distress signals, because that’s just an experience. If you object to this, you’re over-identified with your body.

[Channeler’s note: I sense R’Kok’s girlfriend arriving, sitting down next to him and putting an arm around him. He hugs her back, and I sense an incredible tenderness and peace between them. R’Kok considers saying something about me writing down this paragraph, then he just continues the message.]

In fact, you probably think that your hand’s proper role is to serve your body, right? You wouldn’t like it if your hand decided to just go do whatever it wanted to do, regardless of how you felt about it.

Well, while your incarnation has free will, it’s best for your incarnation if it just stops resisting and empties itself out and serves your soul (or serves the divine). This leads to a more fulfilling life and more happiness, and it lets you profoundly help the world as a whole.

If you’re in resistance to anything, then your soul might want to keep that thing in your life or might want to keep that situation going on, until you release resistance. Now your soul merely occasionally nudges your life, what your soul wants isn’t what always happens all the time, but still -- what you resist, persists.

Also, there’s value in having high consciousness people in average situations, such as spiritually evolved people being on an average workfloor. This can teach the high-consciousness person some important lessons, and this can also tremendously help out the other people -- whether through sheer presence and love, or just by someone being very competent and making the situation run smoothly, thus fixing problems and reducing everyone’s stress.

A whole lot of people on Earth are stuck in short-termism. Which is understandable, but if you act from unity consciousness and an eye for the future, you really can do a whole lot of good for the collective -- and acting like that reduces the stress of people around you.

Sometimes you’re not the main character. Sometimes your proper role is to go into an unpleasant situation and spread some light, or support others, or learn some lesson. So, go release resistance -- there’s a decent chance that whatever unpleasant situation you’re in contains some valuable lesson, or some opportunity to just release and empty so that you can actually start to appreciate the situation.

A spiritually evolved person isn’t someone who just never encounters unpleasant situations due to manifestation mastery or whatever. A spiritually advanced person is someone who isn’t in resistance, and who has the consciousness to enjoy things, such as perhaps working a normal job, that others would dislike. After enlightenment, chop wood and carry water.

Releasing resistance also means that you have the humility to know when it’s you who might be wrong. And even if you know you’re right, to just share your perspective and offer help, and if they’re rejected, to just let other people make their choices.

At the same time, don’t suppress your judgemental feelings -- observe them, and then take care that your words and actions are fair.

[Channeler’s note: I sense sadness and weariness in R’Kok, and a desire to go cuddle and talk with his girlfriend. At the moment I don’t sense lust in either him or her.]

Well, that was my message for today.

It sucks. I know. I’m sorry. I’m so sorry.

A. S. 

For Era of Light

These channelings are exclusively submitted to Eraoflight.com by the channeler. If you wish to share them elsewhere, please include a link back to the original post.

If you are interested in local meetings with other people also seeking first contact with benevolent ETs, then please see https://eraoflight.com/2024/06/19/hakann-local-meetings-for-those-seeking-first-contact-with-benevolent-ets/ . If you search with control-F for @, then you can quickly find email addresses of those who are organizing local groups. It’s also not too late to post a new (secondary) email address yourself to start a new local group, because we plan to keep linking to that post for the foreseeable future.


 

Compiled by http://violetflame.biz.ly from: